Passaportes colombianos rendem 255 milhões à Casa da Moeda em 10 anos

[Hramos3]

A ser verdade o que se lê por aí, essa história dos aviões tem que se lhe diga...

Então a NATO dá luz verde à Polónia para entregar os aviões à Ucrânia, Polónia essa que os entrega em Rammstein para que eles os despachem para a Ucrânia, mas aqui chegados já é má ideia??

A ser verdade é muito, muito grave.

[luislobs]

Lusitanus states hoje ja vieram dizer que isso esta totalmente fora de equação, claro q era por a nato no assunto e isso esta fora de causa.

[Lusitanus]

A saga dos caças continua...

Poland's offer of fighter jets 'not tenable' - US Pentagon

Earlier, Poland said it was going to send its MIG-29 jets to the US's Rammstein Air Base in southwestern Germany.

Warsaw said they would be "placed at the disposal of the government of the United States of America".

The idea is apparently to send them on to Ukraine - see our earlier post at 19.09 for more details.

Now, though, the move appears to be in doubt.

Pentagon press secretary John Kirby said the decision about "whether to transfer Polish-owned planes to Ukraine is ultimately one for the Polish government".

He added that the proposal "raises serious concerns for the entire NATO alliance" and it is "simply not clear to us that there is a substantive rationale for it".

He continued: "We will continue to consult with Poland and our other NATO allies about this issue and the difficult logistical challenges it presents, but we do not believe Poland's proposal is a tenable one."

Sky News

A entrega de aviões MIG à Ucrânia, se for concretizada, tem potencial para fazer escalar a guerra por parte da Rússia ...

[mais_um]

WASHINGTON/LVIV, Ukraine, March 9 (Reuters) - Ukraine must hold off Russia's attack for the next seven to 10 days to deny Moscow claiming any sort of victory, said a senior government official, as more than 2 million refugees fled the biggest assault on a European country since World War Two.

Vadym Denysenko, adviser to Ukraine's interior minister, said Russia was desperate for at least some kind of victory, citing the cities of Mariupol or the capital Kyiv as the most likely targets.

"They need at least some victory before they are forced into the final negotiations," Denysenko wrote on Facebook.

"Therefore our task is to stand for the next 7-10 days."

@Reuters

[mais_um]

'Ukraine's air defences enjoying success' - UK Defence

The UK government's latest dispatch on the war

states that Ukraine's air defences have "enjoyed considerable success" against Russian aircraft.

That has likely prevented Moscow from achieving "any degree of control of the air", the Defence Ministry said.

Its brief also noted that Russian forces continue to struggle in their Kyiv campaign and have failed to make any breakthroughs in taking the capital.

@BBC

[PMP69]

https://canaltech.com.br/veiculos/imagens-fortes-helicoptero-russo-e-abatido-por-arma-antiaerea-da-ucrania-veja-210796/

Pedro

[PMP69]

Esses caças não mudam a guerra, se no caso do exercito demora algum tempo a colocar e a preparar mais tropas e material, no caso dos caças é bem mais fácil os russos colocaram mais aqui na zona para enfrentar esses mais os que ainda restam aos ucranianos.

Penso que seria mais eficaz sistemas anti aéreos mais modernos de forma a garantir a segurança dos aeroportos, aqueles misseis de cruzeiro que vimos a destruir um aeroporto recentemente parece-me que teriam sido facilmente abatidos por uma bateria de patriots, por exemplo.

São mais uma forma de pressão, mas nesta fase não faz a diferença.

Pelos aviões e helicópteros que têm abatido, já devem haver muitos mísseis terra/ar na Ucrânia, e acredito que quando conseguirem restringir o domínio aéreo russo, vão contra atacar e fazer recuar os russos.

Pedro

[cloubird]

https://www.jn.pt/mundo/putin-assina-de ... 62028.html

Depois de Maduro ser perdoado, e do irão entrar na equação, só falta o irão dizer que vai enriquecer mais uranio e experimentar construir uma nuc


Diria que agora ficamos nas mãos do antigo eixo do mal.

[yaya]

O terror dos russos.
Os agricultores ucranianos já devem ter mais tanques que a NATO
Memes de tratores ucranianos já se tornaram virais.

IMG_20220309_014248.jpg (64.46 KiB) Visualizado 7092 vezes

[mais_um]

Esses caças não mudam a guerra, se no caso do exercito demora algum tempo a colocar e a preparar mais tropas e material, no caso dos caças é bem mais fácil os russos colocaram mais aqui na zona para enfrentar esses mais os que ainda restam aos ucranianos.

Penso que seria mais eficaz sistemas anti aéreos mais modernos de forma a garantir a segurança dos aeroportos, aqueles misseis de cruzeiro que vimos a destruir um aeroporto recentemente parece-me que teriam sido facilmente abatidos por uma bateria de patriots, por exemplo.

[yaya]

Mas o plano inicial não era esse. Era conquistar o país inteiro, eliminar o governo, substituíndo por um fantoche e tomar a capital.
Já estava tudo preparado para a festa e propaganda.

Tendo em conta os recursos humanos e financeiros que investiu na operação, ficar com regiões que já eram do domínio russo é um fracasso. Aliás a Crimeia não era já russa? Fica uma Rússia um pouco mais esticadinha, e ainda ganha uma crise económica e financeira para resolver e a revolta da população. Vitória

Objetivo final de Putin é mudança de regime na Ucrânia, afirma Eurasia

O objetivo final do presidente da Rússia, Vladimir Putin, com a invasão da Ucrânia é derrubar o governo ucraniano atual e realizar uma mudança de regime, segundo o diretor para as Américas do Eurasia Group, Christopher Garman.

https://www.cnnbrasil.com.br/internacio ... a-eurasia/

Logo é fácil concluir que o objetivo até agora não foi alcançado, mesmo apesar das questões da Nato, Crimeia e regiões separatistas.

No fundo queria replicar aquilo que fez na Bielorrússia.

Agora destruiu uma série de hospitais. Uma réplica do que aconteceu na Síria.
As mesmas táticas, os hábitos, os mesmos objetivos. A história repete-se.

Mesmo que seja alcançado um acordo de paz, Zelinsky nunca mais terá sossego para o resto da vida. Putim quererá vingança. Jamais admitirá que lá continue um governante que lhe fez frente e conseguiu resistir à invasão.

[MarcoAntonio]

A saga dos caças continua...

Poland's offer of fighter jets 'not tenable' - US Pentagon

Earlier, Poland said it was going to send its MIG-29 jets to the US's Rammstein Air Base in southwestern Germany.

Warsaw said they would be "placed at the disposal of the government of the United States of America".

The idea is apparently to send them on to Ukraine - see our earlier post at 19.09 for more details.

Now, though, the move appears to be in doubt.

Pentagon press secretary John Kirby said the decision about "whether to transfer Polish-owned planes to Ukraine is ultimately one for the Polish government".

He added that the proposal "raises serious concerns for the entire NATO alliance" and it is "simply not clear to us that there is a substantive rationale for it".

He continued: "We will continue to consult with Poland and our other NATO allies about this issue and the difficult logistical challenges it presents, but we do not believe Poland's proposal is a tenable one."

Sky News

[654235]

Um video de 1997, o Biden dizia que se a Nato chegasse aos Países Bálticos, os russos acordariam....

[Lusitanus]

Lusitanus, não quero prolongar esta discussão, mas isso tudo é já em cima da invasão, ele nessa altura já estava certamente mais que decidido a invadir (a invasão já estava preparada há muitos meses e certamente decidida há alguns meses, semanas pelo menos). Estou convencido que já estava inclusivamente decidida antes dos JOI, na altura em que a China e a Rússia reafirmaram ao mundo a sua grande aliança.

Estas conversações (e outras que mandou para trás, como com o Boris, por exemplo) eram para entreter. Posso estar errado, naturalmente, mas é a minha leitura e o meu entendimento do Putin. A maior parte do que ele faz é "deception". Além disso, não consigo conceber que ele tenha decidido a invasão de um dia para o outro. O tempo todo que andou a dizer que eram exercícios de treino, já sabia perfeitamente que estava a preparar uma invasão. O resto era teatro. Como tudo, posso estar errado na minha leitura. Mas é como o vejo.

Marco, concordo contigo quando dizes que Putin ját tinha a invasão da Ucrânia planeada há muito tempo. Ele terá feito isso porque terá pensado que as exigências dele não seriam atendidas.

[pepe7]

Banco central russo suspende venda de moeda estrangeira até 9 de setembro
O rublo está em queda e na segunda-feira atingiu novos recordes históricos em relação às moedas ocidentais.

A venda de moeda estrangeira será suspensa na Rússia a partir de quarta-feira até 09 de setembro, anunciou esta terça-feira o Banco Central do país, atingido por sanções ocidentais sem precedentes devido à intervenção militar na Ucrânia.

Entre 9 de março e 9 de setembro de 2022, "os bancos não poderão vender moeda estrangeira aos cidadãos", anunciou o Banco Central da Rússia em comunicado, acrescentando que os russos poderão, no entanto, trocar moeda estrangeira por rublos durante esse período "a qualquer momento, a qualquer hora e em qualquer montante".

O levantamento de dinheiro de contas em moeda estrangeira abertas em bancos russos também será limitado a 10.000 dólares americanos (cerca de 9.180 euros) até 09 de setembro e o restante só poderá ser retirado em rublos à taxa de câmbio atual.

Independentemente da moeda da conta, o levantamento só pode ser feito em dólares americanos e apenas na caixa, refere o comunicado, indicando que o prazo para qualquer transação deste tipo deverá ser de "vários dias".

O rublo está em queda e na segunda-feira atingiu novos recordes históricos em relação às moedas ocidentais, devido às sanções ocidentais à Rússia sem precedentes, que têm como alvo o Banco Central e os maiores bancos russos.

Hoje, a economia russa sofreu outro golpe, com o embargo decretado pelo presidente dos Estados Unidos, Joe Biden, às importações norte-americanas de petróleo e gás russos.
https://www.tsf.pt/mundo/banco-central-russo-suspende-venda-de-moeda-estrangeira-ate-9-de-setembro-14662089.html?utm_source=push&utm_medium=mas&utm_term=14662089

[mais_um]

Eu também concordo com o Marco, o que ele realmente queira e sentia foi o discurso que ele fez uns dias antes da invasão.
Depois de ler o discurso comentei com os meus amigos que ou a Ucrânia capitulava ou a Rússia atacava. E acertei.

[MarcoAntonio]

Lusitanus, não quero prolongar esta discussão, mas isso tudo é já em cima da invasão, ele nessa altura já estava certamente mais que decidido a invadir (a invasão já estava preparada há muitos meses e certamente decidida há alguns meses, semanas pelo menos). Estou convencido que já estava inclusivamente decidida antes dos JOI, na altura em que a China e a Rússia reafirmaram ao mundo a sua grande aliança.

Estas conversações (e outras que mandou para trás, como com o Boris, por exemplo) eram para entreter. Posso estar errado, naturalmente, mas é a minha leitura e o meu entendimento do Putin. A maior parte do que ele faz é "deception". Além disso, não consigo conceber que ele tenha decidido a invasão de um dia para o outro. O tempo todo que andou a dizer que eram exercícios de treino, já sabia perfeitamente que estava a preparar uma invasão. O resto era teatro. Como tudo, posso estar errado na minha leitura. Mas é como o vejo.

[mais_um]

Isso diz respeito a uma carta que a Rússia enviou aos Estados Unidos há algum tempo atrás, correcto?

Sim, foram duas propostas de Tratados, uma com os EUA e outra com a NATO, sobre segurança, condição para descalar a situação na Ucrânia.
São de Dezembro de 2021 e claro não podiam ser aceites pelos EUA e pela NATO.

[Lusitanus]

Se Putin tivesse conseguido antes da invasão da Ucrânia o reconhecimento por parte da Ucrânia da perda territorial da Crimeia e da região de Donbass e o compromisso da Ucrânia de que não aderiria a qualquer à NATO, nem à União Europeia, penso que não teria existido invasão da Ucrânia por parte da Rússia.

Tanto quanto sei, ele nem sequer tentou...

Não tentou?!

Fartou-se de falar com líderes ocidentais nesse sentido antes da invasão da Ucrânia por parte da Rússia ...

Não, fartou-se de dizer que eram "exercícios de treino" e os seus subordinados diziam que o ocidente estava histérico, que não havia nenhuma intenção de invadir. Mantiveram essa narrativa até aos dias imediatamente antes da invasão.

Estas coisas não se resolvem à distância de tweets ou com conferências de imprensa. Seria preciso realizar uma cimeira com todas as partes interessadas e chegar a um acordo escrito. Que eu tenha conhecimento, a Rússia não tentou nada disto. Mandou para lá tropas e mais tropas, alegou que eram exercícios de treino, revigorou a parceria com a China, aparentemente combinou com esta invadir só depois dos JOI e assim que estes terminaram, o exercício de treino transformou-se numa invasão full-scale.



Naturalmente que era bem sabido que Putin não queria a adesão da Ucrânia à NATO (ou qualquer outro alargamento, diga-se) mas isso não é uma solução diplomática: se não passa por qualquer tipo de negociação/acordo, é meramente uma exigência unilateral.

É verdade que estas coisas não se resolvem com tweets ou com conferências de imprensa. Resolvem-se conversando e houve várias conversas, quer presencias, quer não presenciais, entre Putin e lideres Ocidentais, antes da invasão da Ucrânia pela Rússia.

Por exemplo:

https://www.publico.pt/2022/02/07/mundo ... ia-1994625

https://www.jn.pt/mundo/macron-vai-volt ... 82397.html

https://www.dn.pt/internacional/putin-e ... 90633.html

[mais_um]

Sobre a seriedade das propostas da Russia temos este artigo de opinião:

Russia’s draft agreements with NATO and the United States: Intended for rejection?

Russia maintains the world’s largest nuclear arsenal and the most powerful conventional military forces in Europe. Russian military units currently are deployed — uninvited and unwanted — in Ukraine, Georgia, and Moldova. As Russia’s massing of
military power near Ukraine prompted a crisis, President Vladimir Putin has demanded legally-binding
security guarantees for… Russia.

On December 17, the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs took the unusual step of
publishing draft U.S.-Russia and NATO-Russia agreements that encapsulate Moscow’s desired guarantees. The substance of the drafts and the way the Russians publicized them do not suggest a serious negotiating bid.

If the Kremlin is serious about negotiating and deescalates the situation near Ukraine, the West could engage on some elements of the drafts. Many, however, will go nowhere — as Moscow surely knew.

https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-fr ... rejection/

[MarcoAntonio]

Isso diz respeito a uma carta que a Rússia enviou aos Estados Unidos há algum tempo atrás, correcto?

[mais_um]

Em relação à Ucrânia já sabemos o que pediu...

[mais_um]

E o que Putin exigiu aos EUA:

17 December 2021 13:30
Treaty between The United States of America and the Russian Federation on security guarantees

The United States of America and the Russian Federation, hereinafter referred to as the "Parties",

guided by the principles contained in the Charter of the United Nations, the 1970 Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Cooperation among States in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, the 1975 Helsinki Final Act of the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe, as well as the provisions of the 1982 Manila Declaration on the Peaceful Settlement of Disputes, the 1999 Charter for European Security, and the 1997 Founding Act on Mutual Relations, Cooperation and Security between the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and the Russian Federation,

recalling the inadmissibility of the threat or use of force in any manner inconsistent with the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations both in their mutual and international relations in general,

supporting the role of the United Nations Security Council that has the primary responsibility for maintaining international peace and security,

recognizing the need for united efforts to effectively respond to modern security challenges and threats in a globalized and interdependent world,

considering the need for strict compliance with the principle of non-interference in the internal affairs, including refraining from supporting organizations, groups or individuals calling for an unconstitutional change of power, as well as from undertaking any actions aimed at changing the political or social system of one of the Contracting Parties,

bearing in mind the need to create additional effective and quick-to-launch cooperation mechanisms or improve the existing ones to settle emerging issues and disputes through a constructive dialogue on the basis of mutual respect for and recognition of each other’s security interests and concerns, as well as to elaborate adequate responses to security challenges and threats,

seeking to avoid any military confrontation and armed conflict between the Parties and realizing that direct military clash between them could result in the use of nuclear weapons that would have far-reaching consequences,

reaffirming that a nuclear war cannot be won and must never be fought, and recognizing the need to make every effort to prevent the risk of outbreak of such war among States that possess nuclear weapons,

reaffirming their commitments under the Agreement between the United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on Measures to Reduce the Risk of Outbreak of Nuclear War of 30 September 1971, the Agreement between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on the Prevention of Incidents On and Over the High Seas of 25 May 1972, the Agreement between the United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on the Establishment of Nuclear Risk Reduction Centers of 15 September 1987, as well as the Agreement between the United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on the Prevention of Dangerous Military Activities of 12 June 1989,

have agreed as follows:

Article 1

The Parties shall cooperate on the basis of principles of indivisible, equal and undiminished security and to these ends:

shall not undertake actions nor participate in or support activities that affect the security of the other Party;

shall not implement security measures adopted by each Party individually or in the framework of an international organization, military alliance or coalition that could undermine core security interests of the other Party.

Article 2

The Parties shall seek to ensure that all international organizations, military alliances and coalitions in which at least one of the Parties is taking part adhere to the principles contained in the Charter of the United Nations.

Article 3

The Parties shall not use the territories of other States with a view to preparing or carrying out an armed attack against the other Party or other actions affecting core security interests of the other Party.

Article 4

The United States of America shall undertake to prevent further eastward expansion of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and deny accession to the Alliance to the States of the former Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.

The United States of America shall not establish military bases in the territory of the States of the former Union of Soviet Socialist Republics that are not members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, use their infrastructure for any military activities or develop bilateral military cooperation with them.

Article 5

The Parties shall refrain from deploying their armed forces and armaments, including in the framework of international organizations, military alliances or coalitions, in the areas where such deployment could be perceived by the other Party as a threat to its national security, with the exception of such deployment within the national territories of the Parties.

The Parties shall refrain from flying heavy bombers equipped for nuclear or non-nuclear armaments or deploying surface warships of any type, including in the framework of international organizations, military alliances or coalitions, in the areas outside national airspace and national territorial waters respectively, from where they can attack targets in the territory of the other Party.

The Parties shall maintain dialogue and cooperate to improve mechanisms to prevent dangerous military activities on and over the high seas, including agreeing on the maximum approach distance between warships and aircraft.

Article 6

The Parties shall undertake not to deploy ground-launched intermediate-range and shorter-range missiles outside their national territories, as well as in the areas of their national territories, from which such weapons can attack targets in the national territory of the other Party.

Article 7

The Parties shall refrain from deploying nuclear weapons outside their national territories and return such weapons already deployed outside their national territories at the time of the entry into force of the Treaty to their national territories. The Parties shall eliminate all existing infrastructure for deployment of nuclear weapons outside their national territories.

The Parties shall not train military and civilian personnel from non-nuclear countries to use nuclear weapons. The Parties shall not conduct exercises or training for general-purpose forces, that include scenarios involving the use of nuclear weapons.

Article 8

The Treaty shall enter into force from the date of receipt of the last written notification on the completion by the Parties of their domestic procedures necessary for its entry into force.

Done in two originals, each in English and Russian languages, both texts being equally authentic.



For the United States of America


For the Russian Federation

https://mid.ru/ru/foreign_policy/rso/na ... 8/?lang=en

[yaya]

Fitch já anuncia default iminente da Rússia.
Há-de ser a 1ª vitória de Putim.

https://www.istoedinheiro.com.br/fitch- ... do-pais-2/

[mais_um]

Só para recordar o que o Putin exigiu da NATO:

17 December 2021 13:26
Agreement on measures to ensure the security of The Russian Federation and member States of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization

he Russian Federation and the member States of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), hereinafter referred to as the Parties,

reaffirming their aspiration to improve relations and deepen mutual understanding,

acknowledging that an effective response to contemporary challenges and threats to security in our interdependent world requires joint efforts of all the Parties,

determined to prevent dangerous military activity and therefore reduce the possibility of incidents between their armed forces,

noting that the security interests of each Party require better multilateral cooperation, more political and military stability, predictability, and transparency,

reaffirming their commitment to the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations, the 1975 Helsinki Final Act of the Conference on Security and Co-operation in Europe, the 1997 Founding Act on Mutual Relations, Cooperation and Security between the Russian Federation and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, the 1994 Code of Conduct on Politico-Military Aspects of Security, the 1999 Charter for European Security, and the Rome Declaration "Russia-NATO Relations: a New Quality" signed by the Heads of State and Government of the Russian Federation and NATO member States in 2002,

have agreed as follows:

Article 1

The Parties shall guide in their relations by the principles of cooperation, equal and indivisible security. They shall not strengthen their security individually, within international organizations, military alliances or coalitions at the expense of the security of other Parties.

The Parties shall settle all international disputes in their mutual relations by peaceful means and refrain from the use or threat of force in any manner inconsistent with the purposes of the United Nations.

The Parties shall not create conditions or situations that pose or could be perceived as a threat to the national security of other Parties.

The Parties shall exercise restraint in military planning and conducting exercises to reduce risks of eventual dangerous situations in accordance with their obligations under international law, including those set out in intergovernmental agreements on the prevention of incidents at sea outside territorial waters and in the airspace above, as well as in intergovernmental agreements on the prevention of dangerous military activities.

Article 2

In order to address issues and settle problems, the Parties shall use the mechanisms of urgent bilateral or multilateral consultations, including the NATO-Russia Council.

The Parties shall regularly and voluntarily exchange assessments of contemporary threats and security challenges, inform each other about military exercises and maneuvers, and main provisions of their military doctrines. All existing mechanisms and tools for confidence-building measures shall be used in order to ensure transparency and predictability of military activities.

Telephone hotlines shall be established to maintain emergency contacts between the Parties.

Article 3

The Parties reaffirm that they do not consider each other as adversaries.

The Parties shall maintain dialogue and interaction on improving mechanisms to prevent incidents on and over the high seas (primarily in the Baltics and the Black Sea region).

Article 4

The Russian Federation and all the Parties that were member States of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization as of 27 May 1997, respectively, shall not deploy military forces and weaponry on the territory of any of the other States in Europe in addition to the forces stationed on that territory as of 27 May 1997. With the consent of all the Parties such deployments can take place in exceptional cases to eliminate a threat to security of one or more Parties.

Article 5

The Parties shall not deploy land-based intermediate- and short-range missiles in areas allowing them to reach the territory of the other Parties.

Article 6

All member States of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization commit themselves to refrain from any further enlargement of NATO, including the accession of Ukraine as well as other States.

Article 7

The Parties that are member States of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization shall not conduct any military activity on the territory of Ukraine as well as other States in the Eastern Europe, in the South Caucasus and in Central Asia.

In order to exclude incidents the Russian Federation and the Parties that are member States of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization shall not conduct military exercises or other military activities above the brigade level in a zone of agreed width and configuration on each side of the border line of the Russian Federation and the states in a military alliance with it, as well as Parties that are member States of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.

Article 8

This Agreement shall not affect and shall not be interpreted as affecting the primary responsibility of the Security Council of the United Nations for maintaining international peace and security, nor the rights and obligations
of the Parties under the Charter of the United Nations.



Article 9

This Agreement shall enter into force from the date of deposit of the instruments of ratification, expressing consent to be bound by it, with the Depositary by more than a half of the signatory States. With respect to a State that deposited its instrument of ratification at a later date, this Agreement shall enter into force from the date of its deposit.

Each Party to this Agreement may withdraw from it by giving appropriate notice to the Depositary. This Agreement shall terminate for such Party [30] days after receipt of such notice by the Depositary.

This Agreement has been drawn up in Russian, English and French, all texts being equally authentic, and shall be deposited in the archive of the Depositary, which is the Government of ...



Done in [the city of …] this [XX] day of [XX] two thousand and [XX].

https://mid.ru/ru/foreign_policy/rso/na ... 3/?lang=en