IRS desce de novo em setembro. Veja as simulações

[Ertai]

Olha para os gráficos de 4 anos..

Estará assim tão alto?

Mas sim, acredito numa correcção em Setembro e em Outubro mantemos o Bull Rally até ao fim do ano

Mas olha bem para a IBM e até a minha querida Nvidia (NVDA) o resultado da AT é simples! Comprar! Até agora tem sido dinheiro fácil, quando a tendência inverter os gráficos irão demonstrar isso a tempo de evitar perdas significantes

Abraços,

Ertai

[Camisa Roxa]

Já farta todos os comentários: isto está a subir mas há-de cair em breve (só não se sabe é quando) porque não há razões para subir mais, só para cair

Caramba, olhem para os gráficos

Incognitus, eu sei que és contra o lixo, mas se o lixo me faz ganhar dinheiro então eu adoro lixo!

O que é a INTC comparada com a BFLY? Ou a MSFT com a RBAK? Para mim é tudo igual. A maior parte das vezes nem conheço os nomes das empresas, só os TICKERS e é só o que é preciso, isso e um gráfico

[Ulisses Pereira]

"Intellectually Right + Losing Money = Wrong!"

By James J. Cramer
09/09/2003 09:42 AM EDT


"It's all phony ... except the prices. There, in one fell swoop I have answered all of the technical folks' objections, as well as the objections of the Fleckensteins and the Monish Pabrais.

I, too, can sit here and talk about how the gross domestic product is inflated and the unemployment rate is really 15% and the war in Iraq is going horribly.


I can come up with a gazillion reasons stocks shouldn't be where they are: beating already reduced estimates, bogus pension plan assumptions, artificial short squeezes by hedge funds caught leaning the wrong way, mo-mo funds pressing their bets, asset allocators forced into being in stocks.

I can rail against all sorts of nuttiness, including the run in cell-phone stocks when end demand isn't there yet, the ridiculous valuations of tech on past earnings, the ridiculous valuation of tech on future earnings, the over exuberance of the cyclicals, the blind love for Chinese and online educational stocks, the overvaluations of semiconductor equipment stocks, the meteoric rise of everything with "semiconductor" in its name, the outrageous premium being paid by the French for a stake in also-ran Regeneron.

You think I don't see the fallacy of spending $87 billion more on Iraq and having it funded with tax cuts? You think I've never read Through the Looking Glass, Homage to Catalonia, The Federalist Papers, de Tocqueville, Das Kapital or What Is to Be Done? Give me a break.

In the end, though, I can sell someone millions of shares at these prices. Someone can hit the bid for 9 million shares of Skyworks Solutions for $11 and change after the bell. Yeah, the same Skyworks Solutions that most investment firms called worthless when it was $5. I'd have to take stock up to $29 to build a big position, or cover one, in Broadcom. Nortel didn't go out of business; in fact, it is going to be a leading percentage gainer when 2003 is through.


There were 343 new highs on the Nasdaq Monday and two new lows, and those two new lows aren't anything I -- or you -- have ever heard of. There were 315 new highs on the New York Stock Exchange Monday and four new lows, and the lows were two closed-end mutual funds, a piece of preferred no one owns and some ne'er-do-well auto parts company.

You can't juke the new highs. You can sit there and rail at the craziness of the market but there were 658 ways to make a lot of money revealed by these two lists, and they were available to all with an open mind.


Lately I have taken a lot of heat in my email and on my television show for emphasizing the bullish side of things. I read on this site and our sister sites the comments of tons of people who hate the market, with a passion. They are mad at it, furious with it. They'd like to spit on the thing if there were an embodiment -- hm, is that the source of some of the enmity directed toward Dick Grasso now?

But, like it or not, there's been a ton of money to be made this year and by golly, it is being made.

At some point, the bears, the perma-bears, the doubters, the flat-earth folks, are going to put on the defensive. At some point it might dawn on those who bird-dog me for putting so many bullish guests on "Kudlow & Cramer" that I like being right, I like making money, I hate being wrong, I hate losing money.

Don't you?

When the bears come back with the following answer: "I like being wrong, I like losing money," then I will acknowledge their truthfulness and their outlook.

Being intellectually right but monetarily wrong is, well, being wrong. Rigor resides with those who make money, not lose money. Those who fail to keep up with the averages at the end of the year get money taken away from them. Those who succeed get more money. Until we are somehow all whisked back into school, where A's matter and not dollars, I'm sticking with my metric. "

(in www.realmoney.com)