Vega facing withdrawals after steep losses
By Anuj Gangahar in New York
Financial Times
Updated: 10:42 p.m. ET Oct. 4, 2006
Steep trading losses at Vega Asset Management, an embattled hedge fund firm, may lead some investors to withdraw money, cutting its assets to as low as $1bn, from a peak of about $12bn.
Hedge fund industry insiders said a Vega bet on bond prices had sparked redemptions and inquiries about withdrawals from some fund of hedge fund investors. Ben Mann, a spokesman for Vega, said: "It is not the case that redemptions for this month are material or that they have added to trading losses." But Mr Mann said he expected redemptions, although it was "too early to speculate about these".
The investors' actions, coupled with Vega's losses as a result of a losing bet on the direction of Japanese, US and European bonds, which have rallied recently, have seen the fund's assets sink.
Sources familiar with the firm said assets could be as low as $1bn, while others said it still had several billion dollars under management. Two years ago it had $12bn under management.
Mr Mann said it was not Vega policy to comment on the size of assets except to shareholders.
He added: "We are a very substantial organisation and expect to remain so." He neither confirmed nor denied that assets were now at about $1bn but said the firm had no intention of winding down. A London-based fund of hedge fund manager said: "I would not expect them to disappear." He added: "You have to remember that this is a fund that has at least three years of perfect returns. There is no reason to believe that a fund such as this that is down one month will necessarily be down the next."
Until recently Vega was one of the success stories of the hedge fund industry as its assets under management surged five-fold in less than two years. It is based in Madrid and New York. But Vega recently reported its first calendar year of negative returns after nine years in business.
Many investors believe the best lifespan for a single manager hedge fund is five years, after which many managers are thought to be past their peak for various reasons including a lack of fresh ideas.
Copyright The Financial Times Ltd. All rights reserved.
URL:
http://msnbc.msn.com/id/15132166/