
Curioso o comentário rápido do analista das biotecnológicas do Realmoney:
Adam Feuerstein
"Amgen didn't miss"
1/22/04 04:22 PM ET
"Who missed, Amgen or the analysts? There's a strong argument for the latter.
When Amgen provided financial guidance on Dec. 15, it forecast 2003 adjusted EPS in the middle of its $1.85 to $1.95 range. Well, Amgen reported tonight 2003 adjusted EPS of $1.90 per share. You don't need a calculator to see Amgen hit it's number exactly as forecast. Seems to me that analysts failed to adjust their models after the Dec. 15 conference call ? I guess that's their prerogative, but is it fair to say Amgen missed when it actually didn't?
Not that this matter since CNBC, Reuters, Bloomberg, etc. are all reporting that Amgen missed."
(in www.realmoney.com)
Adam Feuerstein
"Amgen didn't miss"
1/22/04 04:22 PM ET
"Who missed, Amgen or the analysts? There's a strong argument for the latter.
When Amgen provided financial guidance on Dec. 15, it forecast 2003 adjusted EPS in the middle of its $1.85 to $1.95 range. Well, Amgen reported tonight 2003 adjusted EPS of $1.90 per share. You don't need a calculator to see Amgen hit it's number exactly as forecast. Seems to me that analysts failed to adjust their models after the Dec. 15 conference call ? I guess that's their prerogative, but is it fair to say Amgen missed when it actually didn't?
Not that this matter since CNBC, Reuters, Bloomberg, etc. are all reporting that Amgen missed."
(in www.realmoney.com)