Cramer fazendo "mea culpa"
2 mensagens
|Página 1 de 1
para mim, este post do Cramer fê-lo subir uns bons ticks na consideração que tenho por ele. gostei!
gostei mto msm, principalmente desta frase:
Everything in this business is a succession of measured clues coupled with emotions and history, a weird, on-the-fly odds game that must be recalculated constantly.
gostei mto msm, principalmente desta frase:
Everything in this business is a succession of measured clues coupled with emotions and history, a weird, on-the-fly odds game that must be recalculated constantly.
Cramer fazendo "mea culpa"
Cramer reconhece aqui o erro da sua previsão de anteontem.
"Humility and the Jobs Report"
By James J. Cramer
10/03/2003 02:54 PM EDT
"Anatomy-of-a-bad-call time. It is not enough to say, "The stock told me the wrong thing." Nor is it enough to rationalize and say, "Hey, we all get some wrong."
Just like when I was at my hedge fund, I have spent the day thinking about what I did wrong on this employment-number call. It was just too easy to dovetail the mutual fund-selling angle I had with the anecdotal job loss I know about and come up with a thesis that said a better entry point awaited.
Now it looks like we won't get it, but I wanted to share with you the breakdown of the missed call, if only to make sure that you know that not only am I not rationalizing -- the employment number wasn't as good as you think -- and to remind you that you have to learn from your mistakes.
First, I let the personal color my perception. I know plenty of people now who can't find a job, many more than last year. I also can read the headlines like everyone else and I get plenty of email that confirms this weakness. I did share with you that I thought Silicon Valley was getting better, but I was deluged with email saying that's wrong.
Second, I tried to game something that was not that gameable: mutual fund flows. I knew that many funds like to take their gains in the September-October period. What I failed to think about is what happens if they had taken them all by October. Can't game the ungameable.
Third, I tried to thread things too closely. I figured that we would have a leg down after the big leg up because, well, that's what we have had for three years. But this is a better market than that. I knew from the exquisite moment that we had morphed out of bear market territory into something bullish, so I should have bet that the downturn just ended was the downturn before we get to Dow 10,000, which, increasingly, is what it looks like.
Fourth, the bond market was just so darn wrong again. I have to tell you, whoever is making big bets in the bond market, you almost have to be contrarian about. That was a terrible bet to go long bonds ahead of the number.
Everything in this business is a succession of measured clues coupled with emotions and history, a weird, on-the-fly odds game that must be recalculated constantly.
In the end, though, it is also hugely humbling even when you think you are reading the clues right.
I have been humbled. "
(in www.realmoney.com)
"Humility and the Jobs Report"
By James J. Cramer
10/03/2003 02:54 PM EDT
"Anatomy-of-a-bad-call time. It is not enough to say, "The stock told me the wrong thing." Nor is it enough to rationalize and say, "Hey, we all get some wrong."
Just like when I was at my hedge fund, I have spent the day thinking about what I did wrong on this employment-number call. It was just too easy to dovetail the mutual fund-selling angle I had with the anecdotal job loss I know about and come up with a thesis that said a better entry point awaited.
Now it looks like we won't get it, but I wanted to share with you the breakdown of the missed call, if only to make sure that you know that not only am I not rationalizing -- the employment number wasn't as good as you think -- and to remind you that you have to learn from your mistakes.
First, I let the personal color my perception. I know plenty of people now who can't find a job, many more than last year. I also can read the headlines like everyone else and I get plenty of email that confirms this weakness. I did share with you that I thought Silicon Valley was getting better, but I was deluged with email saying that's wrong.
Second, I tried to game something that was not that gameable: mutual fund flows. I knew that many funds like to take their gains in the September-October period. What I failed to think about is what happens if they had taken them all by October. Can't game the ungameable.
Third, I tried to thread things too closely. I figured that we would have a leg down after the big leg up because, well, that's what we have had for three years. But this is a better market than that. I knew from the exquisite moment that we had morphed out of bear market territory into something bullish, so I should have bet that the downturn just ended was the downturn before we get to Dow 10,000, which, increasingly, is what it looks like.
Fourth, the bond market was just so darn wrong again. I have to tell you, whoever is making big bets in the bond market, you almost have to be contrarian about. That was a terrible bet to go long bonds ahead of the number.
Everything in this business is a succession of measured clues coupled with emotions and history, a weird, on-the-fly odds game that must be recalculated constantly.
In the end, though, it is also hugely humbling even when you think you are reading the clues right.
I have been humbled. "
(in www.realmoney.com)
2 mensagens
|Página 1 de 1
Quem está ligado:
Utilizadores a ver este Fórum: Crosses, Google [Bot], PacoNasssa, trilhos2006, yggy e 173 visitantes