It's different this time!

It's different this time!
The Nasdaq is up some 30 percent since its October low. Is this rally really for real?
November 22, 2002: 4:48 PM EST
By Bethany McLean, FORTUNE
Sign up for the Street Life e-mail newsletter
NEW YORK (CNN/Money) - Did you know that the Nasdaq is up some 30 percent since its October low? And the S&P and the Dow are both up around 20 percent? So is this rally really for real? (Say that fast.)
Some pros say that it IS different this time: The bond market is quaking, oil prices are falling, and volume has picked up. And we've had seven straight weeks of higher closes for the Dow. (Today, the Dow slipped a small 40.31 to 8,804.84 while the Nasdaq eked out a tiny gain of 1.19 to 1,468.74) I'm a believer! (OK, I'm trying.) Let's hope that disappointment doesn't haunt our dreams. Thanks to Neil Diamond.
STOCK STUFF What a week for Hewlett-Packard. And IBM, and JP Morgan, and Citibank, and so many others. Is it the death of skepticism? Or were we just so skeptical that almost anything had to be good news? GE, which yesterday announced it would miss earnings for the first time in forever, shed 49 cents to $26.36.
Krispy Kreme jumped $2.06 to $39.01 after posting a 55 percent increase in earnings -- looks like the coffee goes well with the doughnuts. And really, what's better than caffeine and sugar?
But all was not completely sunshiny. Brocade fell $2 to $5.28 (27 percent!) after announcing a triple whammy: The company said it will miss earnings, cut 12 percent of its workforce, and ax its chief operating officer. Whew.
And SSB downgraded both Siebel Systems and PeopleSoft to "underperforms" -- aren't we tough? -- because Solly thinks that software profits are likely to disappoint. While PeopleSoft fell $1.04 to $19.99, Siebel recovered from an early slide to close up 8 cents at $8.75.
SANCTIMONY OR SAFETY FROM LAWSUITS? Did Prudential expect the uproar that its decision to prohibit its analysts from speaking to the media has generated? Prudential's ostensible reason is to "send a strong message to the market that Prudential considers its unbiased research to be valuable advice which should be made available to those who pay for it, namely our institutional and retail clients..."
Pru will still allow the media access to its published reports. Here's one reason (there are many) why this is ridiculous. How many retail clients do you know who get more information about a stock than what's in the published report? How many retail clients get to call up an analyst, say Mike Mayo, and ask, "Hey, Mike, about that Citibank call...."
If this helps anyone, it helps institutional investors. (Although analysts usually tell them different things than they tell the media, anyway.) But it sure doesn't help retail clients. Seems to me that Pru wants the free marketing that the media offers its analysts, but they also want to claim that they're better than everyone else. And the person who -- once again -- gets the short end of the stick is the individual investor.
Of course, everyone thinks that Pru's real motive is to lessen the threat of lawsuits stemming from loose-lipped analysts chattering on CNBC and in places like Fortune.
Loose change
You all know I love statistics -- stats make me feel like the world is an orderly, logical place. (Forget about the fact that they're usually flawed.) From a new report by RJ Rudden: Since the collapse of Enron, the credit rating downgrade to upgrade ratio for energy companies is 13:1 versus 3:1 for the three years prior.
"We think the failure of the asset sale strategy will force a major restructuring for company balance sheets with the burden falling on lenders," says RJ Rudden. (Hint: The report is entitled "Financial Distress in the Electric Power Markets -- It's About to get Worse".)...
So it looks like dividends are the new black. Sallie Mae, GE, and Home Depot have all announced dividend increases recently. It's all in the name of stock price salvation....
It lives! (I mean the IPO market.) Sandwich restaurant chain Cosi sold stock at $7 and closed at $7.60. And the company managed to sell stock even though it has never produced a penny in profit! Shades of the 1990s....
Looks like Wall Street firms are going to have to pay some $1 billion in fines to make amends for their overly bullish research. While Wall Street has sinned plenty, don't expect this to fix the problem.
Investment bankers are just one source of pressure for poor besieged research analysts. They also have to contend with company management and with institutional investors -- who are more than happy to see an analyst make an honest call as long as they don't own the stock. And then, there's human nature. Most of us like to be liked, which usually means saying nice things.
The Nasdaq is up some 30 percent since its October low. Is this rally really for real?
November 22, 2002: 4:48 PM EST
By Bethany McLean, FORTUNE
Sign up for the Street Life e-mail newsletter
NEW YORK (CNN/Money) - Did you know that the Nasdaq is up some 30 percent since its October low? And the S&P and the Dow are both up around 20 percent? So is this rally really for real? (Say that fast.)
Some pros say that it IS different this time: The bond market is quaking, oil prices are falling, and volume has picked up. And we've had seven straight weeks of higher closes for the Dow. (Today, the Dow slipped a small 40.31 to 8,804.84 while the Nasdaq eked out a tiny gain of 1.19 to 1,468.74) I'm a believer! (OK, I'm trying.) Let's hope that disappointment doesn't haunt our dreams. Thanks to Neil Diamond.
STOCK STUFF What a week for Hewlett-Packard. And IBM, and JP Morgan, and Citibank, and so many others. Is it the death of skepticism? Or were we just so skeptical that almost anything had to be good news? GE, which yesterday announced it would miss earnings for the first time in forever, shed 49 cents to $26.36.
Krispy Kreme jumped $2.06 to $39.01 after posting a 55 percent increase in earnings -- looks like the coffee goes well with the doughnuts. And really, what's better than caffeine and sugar?
But all was not completely sunshiny. Brocade fell $2 to $5.28 (27 percent!) after announcing a triple whammy: The company said it will miss earnings, cut 12 percent of its workforce, and ax its chief operating officer. Whew.
And SSB downgraded both Siebel Systems and PeopleSoft to "underperforms" -- aren't we tough? -- because Solly thinks that software profits are likely to disappoint. While PeopleSoft fell $1.04 to $19.99, Siebel recovered from an early slide to close up 8 cents at $8.75.
SANCTIMONY OR SAFETY FROM LAWSUITS? Did Prudential expect the uproar that its decision to prohibit its analysts from speaking to the media has generated? Prudential's ostensible reason is to "send a strong message to the market that Prudential considers its unbiased research to be valuable advice which should be made available to those who pay for it, namely our institutional and retail clients..."
Pru will still allow the media access to its published reports. Here's one reason (there are many) why this is ridiculous. How many retail clients do you know who get more information about a stock than what's in the published report? How many retail clients get to call up an analyst, say Mike Mayo, and ask, "Hey, Mike, about that Citibank call...."
If this helps anyone, it helps institutional investors. (Although analysts usually tell them different things than they tell the media, anyway.) But it sure doesn't help retail clients. Seems to me that Pru wants the free marketing that the media offers its analysts, but they also want to claim that they're better than everyone else. And the person who -- once again -- gets the short end of the stick is the individual investor.
Of course, everyone thinks that Pru's real motive is to lessen the threat of lawsuits stemming from loose-lipped analysts chattering on CNBC and in places like Fortune.
Loose change
You all know I love statistics -- stats make me feel like the world is an orderly, logical place. (Forget about the fact that they're usually flawed.) From a new report by RJ Rudden: Since the collapse of Enron, the credit rating downgrade to upgrade ratio for energy companies is 13:1 versus 3:1 for the three years prior.
"We think the failure of the asset sale strategy will force a major restructuring for company balance sheets with the burden falling on lenders," says RJ Rudden. (Hint: The report is entitled "Financial Distress in the Electric Power Markets -- It's About to get Worse".)...
So it looks like dividends are the new black. Sallie Mae, GE, and Home Depot have all announced dividend increases recently. It's all in the name of stock price salvation....
It lives! (I mean the IPO market.) Sandwich restaurant chain Cosi sold stock at $7 and closed at $7.60. And the company managed to sell stock even though it has never produced a penny in profit! Shades of the 1990s....
Looks like Wall Street firms are going to have to pay some $1 billion in fines to make amends for their overly bullish research. While Wall Street has sinned plenty, don't expect this to fix the problem.
Investment bankers are just one source of pressure for poor besieged research analysts. They also have to contend with company management and with institutional investors -- who are more than happy to see an analyst make an honest call as long as they don't own the stock. And then, there's human nature. Most of us like to be liked, which usually means saying nice things.